New Data Protection Bill Encompasses Antitrust Provisions, Redefines Consent In Digital Economy

By Abir Roy , Aman Shankar on July 25, 2024

The statement of the 2023 Data Protection Bill takes cognizance of the fact that data has a huge role to play in the growth of the digital economy.

The Digital Personal Data Protection Bill, 2023’ (DPDP Bill/2023 Bill) passed in the Rajya Sabha on August 9, has adopted a mature approach to regulating and protecting personal data. Adopting the 2022 version, the 2023 Bill has been formulated on the touchstone of a principle-based approach. The statement of the 2023 Bill takes cognizance of the fact that data has a huge role to play in the growth of the digital economy and therefore protection of personal data is equally important and imperative. The economic essence of the Bill and its impetus to businesses and start-ups can be gauged from the exemption provisions created in Clause 17(3) of the 2023 Bill. The Competition Act, (CA) 2002, that closely governs digital markets and activities of market participants, was similarly enacted to support the economic development of the country. The CA governs the conduct pertaining to abuse of dominant position by an enterprise as well as keeps a check on agreements or combinations which will have appreciable adverse effect on competition in the market. A closer analysis of the 2023 Bill will exhibit its correlation and overlap with the CA which businesses must be cautious about for business hygiene. In fact, Clause 6(2), 2023 Bill recognizes that consent shall be invalid even when it is taken in violation of any other law in force (for example, CA).

It is peculiar to note that the 2023 Bill regulates even partly automated processing of personal data. However, it has dropped its applicability to “profiling” activities which means any form of processing of personal data that analyses or predicts aspects concerning the behaviour, attributes or interests of a data principal. This can be an indication that certain classes of AI use (e.g., digital advertising) may be exempted. Similarly, the government may exempt a particular data fiduciary with verifiably safe processing activity from obligations related to parental consent and remove the prohibition on tracking, behavioural monitoring, and targeted advertisement directed at children. But, in all the situations, the antitrust law obligations, covering unfair usage and the leveraging of user data, will apply with full force, especially on the dominant entities in the digital market.

Somewhat similar to Clause 7(8), 2022 Bill, the 2023 Bill in Clause 6(1) read with Clause 5(2) provides that the consent by data principal for already concluded contracts has to be unconditional. This clause also has the potential of addressing issues related to abuse of dominant position by those platforms whose services are unavoidable/necessary in their offerings. Also, the purpose and limitation framework in seeking consent should address the issues pertaining to excessive data collection, which can simultaneously be looked into by the Data Protection Board of India and the Competition Commission of India (CCI). It is also interesting to note that competition law and privacy laws go hand-in-hand in the European Union and the ripple effect can be seen globally, including India. A very seminal European Court of Justice ruling in Case 252/21, Meta Platforms and Ors. v. Bundeskartellamt pronounced recently on July 4, 2023, stated that member state antitrust authorities can enter into the exercise of finding a violation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) while investigating a case of abuse of dominant position. It analysed several vital areas of intersection of both the laws with the crux being that certain conduct may be justified under the GDPR but can run foul under the antitrust laws.